Monthly Archives: April 2013

Christians should argue from silence when appropriate

Very often, when discussing the bible, people make bad arguments from silence. For example, in all thirteen letters of Paul, he never mentions the virgin conception of Jesus Christ. So someone might argue, “I guess Paul doesn’t believe in the virgin birth.” That would be a bad argument from silence.

Suppose someone was accused of murder. A lot of evidence is pointing to their guilt. But in looking at their phone and email records, not once do they ever tell any of their friends that they committed murder. If the jury concluded on that basis that they were not guilty, that would also be a bad argument from silence.

But not all arguments from silence are bad. Take 1 Timothy 2.12: “I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.” Many evangelicals argue that Paul was not permitting women in Ephesus specifically to teach men in the church because they were less educated and some were teaching heresy. That is bad exegesis on so many levels, but my first response is: that’s not what the text says! Paul does not say that is why he is prohibiting women from teaching men, therefore, that is not the reason he is prohibiting women from teaching men.

Go with the text first. Those who refuse to go with the straightforward meaning of straightforward texts are driving an unnecessary wedge between real brothers and sisters in Christ.

Advertisements

Why do we have to keep talking about elders, deacons and church membership???

I never heard the word “polity” before going to seminary. Whenever you talk about elders, deacons and/or church membership, you are talking about church polity– how a church is organized and governed. We are voting on polity changes at Kailua Baptist in August, and I am certain some at our church wonder, “why in the world do we have to keep talking about these issues?” My answer: because the local church matters to God.

In 1 Tim 3.14-15, Paul tells Timothy “I hope to come to you soon, but I write these things to you so that, if I delay, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the Living God, a pillar and buttress of the truth.” The picture there is a temple-type structure—like the Temple of Artemis in ancient Ephesus, where the whole building is surrounded by pillars holding up the whole temple structure. Without the pillars, the roof and the building falls.

And according to 1 Timothy the household of God, which is the church of the Living God, is a pillar of the truth. The truth is the gospel of Jesus Christ (roof), and the church is holding it up (a pillar). The church is not the gospel, but the church protects the gospel. And in fact, as my friend Matt Dirks pointed out to me, there is more than just one pillar, there are many pillars that hold up the truth, so Paul seems to be referring to local churches (or else that’s a bad illustration). The local church matters. And in 1 Timothy 3, right before these verses are the qualifications of overseers/elders and deacons. Elders and deacons are a part of God’s design for the local church, and the local church matters.

So these are issues that should always be a part of a church’s conversations about how to be a faithful gospel presence.